The American Solidarity Party

Third party based on three pillars of Catholic social thought: solidarity, subsidiarity and distributism
Mike Maturen pin (image from

Mike Maturen pin (image from

The following comes from an October 12 Catholic News Agency article:

In a country long entrenched in a two-party political system, Mike Maturen faces an uphill battle.

He’s the 2016 presidential candidate for the little-known American Solidarity Party, which holds views rooted in Catholic social thought.

But while Maturen’s name won’t even be on the ballot in most states – he’s running a write-in campaign in several locations – he thinks this November is the time for Americans to voice their dissatisfaction with Republicans and Democrats alike, and create a better option.

Founded in 2011 as the Christian Democracy Party USA, the party later changed its name to better reflect its principles of Catholic Social Teaching.

“The party itself is a secular party that is informed by faith,” Maturen says. While its members come from various religious backgrounds, and some with no faith background at all, the party’s platform is based upon three pillars of Catholic social thought: solidarity, subsidiarity and distributism.

The American Solidarity Party does not find that it fits comfortably into “conservative” or “liberal” camps. Its platform is staunchly pro-life, but adds that this conviction must also include opposition to the death penalty, as well as social services for mothers in need. Its beliefs on marriage and religious liberty would be considered conservative, while its views on the environment, health care and immigration would be considered more liberal.

Maturen himself was raised Catholic, but left the Church in college and spent years as an evangelical Protestant and later an evangelical Episcopalian before returning to the Catholic Church in 2002. His story has appeared on the EWTN show, The Journey Home.

A few months ago, the party had just 200 members. Now it has 1200, in all 50 states plus Washington, D.C. and Puerto Rico. That’s still incredibly small by political party standards, but Maturen believes that dissatisfaction over the current election cycle is driving interest in third party candidates.

CNA spoke to Maturen about the American Solidarity Party and its goal of creating a platform based upon Catholic Social Teaching. His comments are below:

Can you give a brief overview of your basic platform? Would you consider yourself conservative, liberal, or something else?

Politically, I lean to the conservative side, having spent most of my adult years as a conservative Republican. However, after meditating upon my religious faith and my political beliefs, I realized that the two didn’t always match up. I decided to research further what the Church teaches about the various issues our country deals with. It was then that I discovered the richness of Catholic Social Teaching. I began to work to align my politics with my faith. In that process, I discovered the American Solidarity Party. Our platform is based on Catholic Social Teaching. We could best be described as “centrist” as a party…but not centrist by today’s definition… Politically, we would be considered center-right on social issues and center-left on economic issues. We believe in the economic concept of distributism as taught by GK Chesterton and Hilaire Belloc. We also believe in solidarity (we are all in this together) and subsidiarity, which teaches that problems are best solved where they reside – at the most local level possible. Higher levels of government should only intervene if asked, or if necessary.  For instance, national security issues are best handled at the Federal level, while education issues are best handled at the local/parental level.

The American Solidarity Party calls itself a “whole life party.” What does that mean, and how does it differ from the two major parties today?

The term “whole life” is a short descriptive of believing in the sanctity and dignity of human life from conception to natural death…the WHOLE life. We subscribe to what is often referred to as a “consistent life ethic.” When describing the positions of the two major parties, I like to use the analogy of a bowling alley. The Republican Party by and large has settled into the extreme right, while the Democrats have largely settled into the extreme left. We call these in bowling “the gutters.” Republicans are pro-life in that they are anti-abortion, but often they forget that life does not end when the umbilical cord is cut. The Democrats only seem to care about the babies AFTER they are born. Until then, they are free to sacrifice the unborn on the altar of convenience. Once the baby is born, the left is very good at providing for their care, with a social safety net, etc. We like to think that we take the best of both parties. We need to ensure that the unborn are protected. I believe that we need to have a constitutional or legal definition of personhood for the unborn. That will ensure their right to life. Once that baby is born, we need to be certain that tools are in place for their proper care, to include medical, social, etc. We also believe that a social safety net for the elderly, impoverished and disabled is a key component to the pro-life stance. Finally, we also believe that part of the consistent life ethic is to oppose euthanasia, assisted suicide, embryonic stem cell research and the death penalty.

Your economic plan involves the distributism model. Can you explain a little more about what this would practically look like?

There really are several ways this can be implemented, either fully or incrementally. The core of distributism is to bring the economic engine closer to home. Rather than having a huge portion of our economy wrapped up in the hands and control of a few major corporations, we believe that it is the small business – the mom and pop shops – that drive the economy best. We would propose to re-write regulations to favor the small businesses and family farms, rather than the major corporations that also just so happen to be the major donors to our government officials. Regulations, taxes, etc all need to be re-thought and revamped.

Have you seen growth in your party over this past year?

Yes. We really only got started at gaining ballot access in July. We have grown from a handful of members in a few states to members in all 50 states plus Puerto Rico and the District of Columbia. We have caught the attention of media, large and small…including mentions in publications from Ireland, Italy and the UK. While still comparatively small, we will be a force to be reckoned with in the future.


  1. Wow that’s almost 25 people in each state! Lol

    If that won’t defeat Hillary, I don’t know what will.

    Oh yeah, Donald Trump!

  2. The next President of the USA will be Trump or Clinton only.
    Catholics voting for a 3rd Party candidate will probably elect Hillary Clinton who does not support Freedom of Religion, and wants ALL taxpayers to pay for her agenda of abortion at any stage of development and for any reason.
    If elected, she will appoint judges of like mind.
    * * * * *
    Here is a link to: ” September 22, 2016 – ​TRUMP CAMPAIGN ANNOUNCES CATHOLIC ADVISORY GROUP ”

    • Asbury Fox says

      Unless you live in one of the 12 swing states, your vote doesn’t matter and it isn’t throwing it away to vote 3rd party. The reality is that most of the states in the country are either solid red or blue. Here in California, it is a solid democratic party blue state. Hillary is carrying California.

      • Until all the votes are counted, you have no clue what will happen. You are not God.
        Clinton or Trump will be the next President, and will nominate the next Supreme Court Justices, and Federal Court Judges.

        A vote for a 3rd Party candidate is a vote for Clinton.
        Clinton does not believe in Religious Freedom, and has stated that Religious beliefs much change to support her agenda of abortion.

        • Don’t be naive. A Republican hasn’t carried California since the presidential election of 1988 with George H.W. Bush. California has voted Democrat ever since. Hillary is winning California. Trump and Clinton don’t even bother to campaign for votes here. They only show up to California to collect money.
          It’s going to be Ohio, Florida, Iowa, Virginia, and the rest of the 12 battle ground states that are going to decide the election with their electoral college votes.

  3. John Feeney says

    The Hillary Clinton Campaign is populated with hate filled, anti-Catholic bigots!

  4. Asbury Fox says

    I would love to vote for Mike Maturen, but the American Solidarity Party doesn’t have ballot access in Califonia and didn’t reach write-in status either. For the next presidential election cycle, the American Solidarity Party needs to do a better job in getting ballot access in more states. They will have more name recognition and time. 4 years to get it done.

  5. Michael McDermott says

    Attention all California MassResistance Supporters!

    In the coming weeks you will have the unique opportunity to support a California politician who stuck his neck out and took a stand for what is right!

    South Bay District 66 Assemblyman David Hadley is running for re-election and is in a very tight race! David is a heck of a guy! A family man that stands for old fashioned values and isn’t afraid to stand for his beliefs! He bravely opposed Bill 1146 (an effort to push the LGBT agenda on Christian Colleges) and stood for what is right when so few others would!

    Now YOU have the opportunity to stand alongside him and help him in the final weeks of his campaign!

    From now until the election in November, there are three days each…

  6. Michael McDermott says

    Faith & Freedom Coalition Chairmain, Ralph Reed issued a statement today on the anti-Christian bigotry found in the Wikileaks release of emails within the Clinton campaign.

    “I am deeply troubled by the emails within the Hillary Clinton presidential campaign that show senior campaign officials smearing and ridiculing Roman Catholics and evangelicals.

    This is anti-Christian bigotry, pure and simple. It is sad, offensive, and un-American. It reveals a corporate culture at the Hillary Clinton campaign that tolerated the expression of bigoted and prejudicial views of people of faith. No one should be attacked because of their deeply-held religious beliefs, much less by senior officials of someone who aspires to the presidency.

  7. Nary a peep about Liberty, let alone Constitutional Government, Federalism, Limited Powers, or Term Limits. So much for Catholic politics.

  8. Distributism debunked by the great Dr. Tom Woods:

    Three cheers for Subsidarity. Quoting Lew Rockwell, “if at first you don’t secede, try, try again.” Pray for CalExit, and that God then sends us a good Catholic monarch.

  9. Clinton aide John Halpin e-mail to Clinton media communications director Jennifer Palmieri in 2015:

    “Many of the most powerful elements of the conservative movement are all Catholic (many converts) from the SC [Supreme Court] and think tanks to media and social groups.

    “It’s an amazing bastardization of the faith. They must be attracted to the systematic thought and severely backwards gender relations and must be totally unaware of Christian democracy.”

    Shows the insider thinking in the Clinton org? No matter: even Catholics who read e-mails such as these will still vote Clinton in a few weeks.

  10. Libertarianism and Austrian economics debunked by the great Chris Ferrara:

COMMENTS POLICY: Comments are limited to 750 characters and will be truncated at 750. Comments should not contain offensive or libelous language. Please strive to be civil. All comments are subject to approval by our moderator and to editing as the moderator deems appropriate. Inclusion of your email address is optional.

Speak Your Mind

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

COMMENTS POLICY: Comments are limited to 750 characters and will be truncated at 750. Comments should not contain offensive or libelous language. Please strive to be civil. All comments are subject to approval by our moderator and to editing as the moderator deems appropriate. Inclusion of your email address is optional.