Secular pro-lifer to speak at Walk for Life West Coast

secular pro-lifeOn January 25, 2014, pro-lifers will assemble in San Francisco for the 10th annual Walk for Life West Coast. As the walk has grown it has attracted a diverse group of supporters. The radical nature of the abortion issue is capable of uniting those diverse groups. One such group is Secular Pro-Life.   Like many religious groups, Secular Pro-Life brings rigorous scientific analysis (a recent post was entitled “Don’t impose your science on me!”) to the question, but unlike religious groups they can’t be automatically disregarded by those claiming to see an inherent opposition between religion and science.

On January 29, 2013, Monica Lynn Snyder of Secular Pro-Life posted about her experience at the Walk for Life West Coast:



“This is my 6th Walk for Life West Coast. The first time I attended was only the 2nd year they had the walk. The organizers of the walk explained they wanted to demonstrate that even in one of the most left-wing areas of the country there is a strong pro-life presence. It’s a brilliant idea….While setting our banner up, a man from the rally crossed the street to tell us that we are very welcome to join the rally, regardless of belief system. It was incredibly sweet.”

This year, organizers of the Walk for Life West Coast invited Ms. Snyder to be one of the speakers at the 10th Anniversary Walk for Life West Coast, and she graciously accepted. CalCatholic had a chance to interview Ms. Snyder and to learn about Secular Pro-Life.

How did you reach an anti-abortion position?

I’ve been anti -abortion as long as I can remember. My parents are passionately pro-life, and when I was a kid, being pro-life went without saying, the same way holding any of my parents ’ positions went without saying. As I got older and started to evaluate different issues for myself, my views inevitably diverged from those of my parents on some topics. Abortion wasn’t one of those topics. Learning more about abortion has given me a more nuanced perspective than I once had, but it has remained a distinctly pro-life perspective the entire time.

Once you did reach that position, how did you become involved in pro-life work?

Actually, I got involved largely because of Facebook. In late 2006, I uploaded some pictures from the 2006 Walk for Life to a pro-life Facebook group. Pro-life and pro-choice people began arguing in the comments sections under the photos, and I quickly got absorbed in the arguments too.

Those arguments were my first exposure to the abortion debate as an adult; they were also the beginning of nearly two years of discussing abortion online almost every day. During that time I came to a much better understanding of the pro-life and pro-choice positions. I also became good friends with several pro-life activists, including Kelsey Hazzard, the president of Secular Pro-Life (SPL). As an agnostic, I found SPL very appealing. Kelsey invited me to help her out here and there, and thus began my transition from online debates to a more active role in the pro-life movement.

Can you tell us about the origins of Secular Pro-Life?

SPL began in 2009, when Kelsey had the idea to form a group for nonreligious pro-lifers. At first it was a small Facebook page with maybe 100 or so members, including a “leadership board” consisting of Kelsey, me, and a dozen or so of the more passionate supporters. We would brainstorm about projects for the group and how to encourage other pro-life secularists to join us. Over time our membership grew, with more people helping us expand SPL ’s presence. We now have a few thousand people following our Facebook page (

I ’d like to point out that SPL is an all-volunteer organization, and we owe everything we’ve done so far to the time and resources donated by our members. We’ve had volunteers write guest blog posts, represent us at conferences and walks, and help us put together SPL projects. For example, SPL runs, a website dedicated to tracking abortion malpractice lawsuits and other danger signs from particular clinics. We were able to create because volunteers across the country went to their local courthouses and located the lawsuits and other documents that demonstrate clinic problems. So we are very grateful for the people who help us make these things happen.

We have seen members of Secular Pro-Life at the walk a number of times. Have you attended before, and if so how many times? What has your experience of the walk been?

I began attending the walk in 2006 .I believe this year’s walk will be my 7th time. At first I walked on my own, but in 2010 I began walking as an SPL representative. I’ve enjoyed the walk each time. I really appreciate how the walk organizers strongly encourage a peaceful tone, and I ’m moved by the increasing numbers the Walk draws each year. I also find the pro-choice counter-protesters fascinating. I try to take as many photos as possible of both pro-life and pro-choice signs so I can look them over and juxtapose them afterward. Most of the time I think the two sides talk right past one another, and I’m very interested in trying to understand why that happens and whether that can change.

Although you are a member of Secular Pro-Life, that does not necessarily preclude one’s being a religious person. Do you have any religious beliefs? And to sort of expand on that, if you don’t have religious beliefs, can you describe your philosophical orientation?

You are absolutely correct —SPL has many religious supporters who prefer to use secular anti-abortion arguments. However, I am not religious: I ’m an agnostic. I don’t believe we can know whether a supernatural world exists, and meanwhile I have not seen evidence in my life to suggest that it does.

Where do you live? Are you married? Any kids?

I lived in the Bay area for eight years, five of which were in San Francisco. I live further north now. I am not married and I don’t have kids. I don’t even have pets! I do have a really wonderful boyfriend, though. 🙂

What do you see as the particular benefits that Secular Pro Life brings to the abortion debate?

Speaking as a secular person, I think it’s wonderful that there’s a space for pro–life secularists to come together. Before SPL formed, it was trickier trying to work within the pro-life movement. There’s a strong correlation between being pro -life and being religious, and so pro-lifers are used to discussing their position in shared religious terms. That works fine when everyone in the discussion has a shared basis of belief, but, for example, if the discussion centers on how the soul enters at conception, and I don’t believe in a soul, it’s pretty alienating.

It ’s good for religious pro -lifers to be able to talk about their pro-life position in terms of their shared faith, and likewise it ’s good for non -religious pro-lifers to be able to talk about their pro-life position in secular terms. SPL creates an environment where that can (and does) happen.

I expect nearly all pro-lifers would like to see everyone take the pro-life position. That’s much more likely to happen when we make the pro-life movement accessible to a wider variety of demographics. Polls show that the country as a whole —and the younger generations in particular —are increasingly nonreligious; if we want the pro-life movement to continue to grow, it’s important that we’re able to explain our position in a way that’s accessible to this growing part of the population.

For more information about the Walk, visit:



  1. Abeca Christian says:

    Abortion is wrong.

    “The life of the body is the soul; the life of the soul is God.”
    – St Anthony of Padua

  2. This is extremely problematic to me. And there are so many questions that arise. One would be, as one who is agnostic and pro-life, do you, Monica Lynn Snider, assiduously and continuously search for the answers to life so as one day to come out on the side of atheism and still be a dedicated pro-lifer, as you seem to be? Or will that be the denouement that severs your bond with pro-life? For in agnosticism, doesn’t it require the agnostic to be on a continual and passionate search for the “truth” regarding the existence of God, so as to finally come to “know” one way or the other? What happens after much so-called “searching,” one just “knows” that there’s “no God” out there? As I said above, extremely problematic. And then there’s the question of contraception. What of the facilitative nature of contraception, birth control? For so many contraceptives seem to have a RU-486 nature built in to them and really become “back-up abortion” facilitators when used. Why was not this question put to Ms. Snyder? And not to be nosy, but it would be very instructive to know if the “really wonderful” boyfriend she mentions is of the “live-in” variety, which if so, probably gives the answer to her possible stand on contraceptives. But I’m just asking. It might have been more useful to ask a few more questions, though, by CalCatholic. For what’s next? “Gays for pro-life?” How about “Pagans for life?” Or just “Dummies for life”? On some level, finally, it does occur to me that lucifer may be attempting to run to the head of the “big tent” of coming pro-life activities, to bamboozle and confound the magnificent head of steam that the pro-life movement has generated in the last five or six years, thereby rendering it ineffective. I pray not. God help us if so. God Bless all, Markrite

    • markrite, I am glad you brought up the issue of contraception. While there has been great success in convincing a majority of Americans that abortion is wrong, convincing them of the evil of contraception is quite another matter. I have run into many “pro-lifers” at the “Walk”, among other places, and have found a strong attachment to the “right” to contraception and sterilization. Just as it is necessary to pull out the entire root in order to eliminate a weed, so too will it be necessary to eliminate the “root” of contraception in order to eliminate abortion. Contraception Is the root of abortion!

    • For what’s next? “Gays for pro-life?” How about “Pagans for life?”

      You’re not going to like this (but I do): both of those groups already exist.

      • Kelsey, I can appreciate your angst. However, even St. Paul tells us in Romans 2:14-16, “For when the Gentiles, who have not the law, do by nature those things that are of the law; these having not the law are a law to themselves: Who shew the work of the law written in their hearts, their conscience bearing witness to them, and their thoughts between themselves accusing, or also defending one another, In the day when God shall judge the secrets of men by Jesus Christ, according to my gospel.”

        Being Pro-Life is written on our hearts. So it is right that everyone be Pro-Life. This, of course, does not excuse the queer or pagan from the other sins they choose to practice which are against nature!

        • Being Pro-life has little to do with other “sins”. Pro-lifers who are non-religious or not Christian don’t believe that abortion is sin. They believe its murder. I say this is different because in your prospective you most likely think gays, fornication and other things count as sins and according to the bible you’d be right, it’s just for the rest of us it’s not so simple to lump these together. Saying it’s a sin gives off that it’s only a matter of opinion and religion.
          Also it’s not about “excusing” gays; it’s not about being gay. The pro-life movement is dominantly religious and gay pro-life groups simply invite everyone in where they previous thought they weren’t wanted. By the way, why did you lump pagans in there? I don’t know much about them but they have a right to be here just as much as Christians and Catholics.

          • Your Fellow Catholic says:

            Interesting point Stormii. I’d also note that the anti-gay groups in the US and most places in the world are overwhelmingly religious, primarily Christians. You rarely see an atheist or a non-Christian believer pushing anti-gay laws and lawsuits. Many polls show that the vast majority of those who vote against marriage equality, for example, are regular Church attendees.

          • Stormii, the reason I mentioned pagans and queers is because I was responding to Kelsey.

          • YFC, show me where anyone has ever voted for or “against” marriage “equality”?!!!

          • Ann Malley says:

            YFC, you’re at it again with your non-Catholic psduedo-logic spinning around the ‘intriguing’ aspects of why/how those who come out against SSM would be Christians.

            “…You rarely see an atheist or a non-Christian believer pushing anti-gay laws and lawsuits. Many polls show that the vast majority of those who vote against marriage equality, for example, are regular Church attendees.”

            That last statement is a complete and utter ‘no-duh’ as typically it is the ‘regular attendees’ that actually believe the Faith and seek to do God’s will. That’s why they actually go to mass. Having said that, I’d wager if a poll was taken of Orthodox Jews and/or Muslims (that is those who actually believe what their faith asserts) would vote in favor of SSM. Not unless their hope would be that those infidels would die out as a result of indulging in disordered behaviors.

            ‘Marriage equality’ is the same kind of left leaning rebrand attempt as ‘homophobe’ or ‘gay.’ Satan has quite the marketing department.

            As to lawsuits, I’d say it’s the homosexual community that is targeting Christians…. as there are many atheists and non-Christians who would welcome, say, the baking of a SSM wedding cake or doing the photography.

          • Wrong! India, which is mostly Hindu, has outlawed so-called same-sex marriages and discourages sodomy.

          • My post was in reply to YFC’s post Jan. 2 at 12:03 pm.

    • I’m not Monica Snyder, but I am a fellow agnostic pro-lifer. I can tell you that some agnostics, such as me, see themselves as being in the midst of a search for the truth, while others see the question of the existence of a supernatural power as ultimately unknowable. If I were to ultimately be definitively convinced that no supernatural power exists, by no means would it cause me to stop being pro-life. I wouldn’t suddenly be in favor of killing human beings at any other stage of life, so why would the unborn be any different?
      I’m pro-life because I want to protect human beings and uphold their rights, not because I want to enforce my ideas of sin and morality on other people.

  3. I welcome Miss Snyder to the Pro-Life movement. Yes, as a believer in the Blessed Trinity and the Holy Catholic Church, my wish would be for her to eventually find the joy and peace found in communion with Jesus Christ and the the Holy Catholic Church. We must remember, however, all of us are in a Mission Field. Even the greatest missionaries, including St. Paul and the Apostles understood that conversion takes place within relationships.

  4. My thoughts exactly. Jesus gave the all-inclusive example.

  5. Marcy Benoist says:

    Thank you Tracy. I agree with you 100 %.
    Welcome Monica.

COMMENTS POLICY: Comments are limited to 750 characters and will be truncated at 750. Comments should not contain offensive or libelous language. Please strive to be civil. All comments are subject to approval by our moderator and to editing as the moderator deems appropriate. Inclusion of your email address is optional.

Speak Your Mind

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

COMMENTS POLICY: Comments are limited to 750 characters and will be truncated at 750. Comments should not contain offensive or libelous language. Please strive to be civil. All comments are subject to approval by our moderator and to editing as the moderator deems appropriate. Inclusion of your email address is optional.