Who is California’s travel ban affecting?

Students, college athletes and academics among those who can't get state funding for trips to 'anti-LGBT' states

Mrak Hall, the administrative center of UC Davis. (Joseph DeSantis / Getty Images)

UC Davis senior Acacia Keith was excited to present her research on the anti-abortion movement at what would have been her first national conference this spring.

The Council on Undergraduate Research conference, which showcases work by more than 3,000 undergraduates, is considered a premier opportunity to make an academic mark and network for jobs and graduate programs. UC Davis was going to pay for Keith to travel there.

But there’s a problem. The conference is being held this year at the University of Memphis in Tennessee. A new California law bans state-funded travel to states that discriminate against the LGBT community. And the California attorney general has listed Tennessee as one of them, along with Kansas, North Carolina and Mississippi.

At least 18 students at UC Davis, UC Santa Barbara and Cal State Long Beach planned to attend the Memphis conference with their trips paid by the state schools. More than 100 Californians were selected for the April gathering, but Elizabeth Ambos, the council’s executive director, could not say how many attended public universities that are subject to the law.

The law also has led to the cancellation of preliminary talks between UC Berkeley and the University of Kansas for a men’s basketball series, the Lawrence (Kan.) Journal-World reported.

Kansas is on the banned list because it adopted a law last year that allows campus religious groups to exclude LGBT students and faculty from membership.

Tennessee was included because of a 2016 law that allows allows therapists and counselors with “sincerely held principles” to reject LGBT clients.

At UC Davis, people have been trying to work out how they feel about the new law, which took effect Jan. 1.

Naomi Janowitz, a UC Davis religious studies professor, said faculty members and students have discussed whether the undergraduates should attend the Memphis conference even if they could raise private funds for the trip. At one point, she said, they read the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr.’s “Letter from a Birmingham Jail” to reflect on his words that injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.

Mark Rivera, a UC Davis senior majoring in religious studies and cognitive science, said he wants to attend if he can find funding. He said it was more important to talk with people with different values than to shun them — especially at a time of such political polarization.

“The law is a juvenile but well-intended reaction to a real problem,” Rivera said. “Instead of discouraging travel to supposedly backward places, we should encourage travel; otherwise, campuses will become more insular and make the problem worse.”

Ambos, of the research council, said the University of Memphis was selected to host the conference three years ago —  well before either the California law or the Tennessee law it singles out was passed. She said bids for future conferences would be evaluated in the context of the council’s commitment to diversity and inclusiveness.

are required by grants, litigation or contracts signed before Jan.1.
UCLA’s football team, for instance, has one previously scheduled game at Memphis this fall but will not schedule further visits to any banned states and is “fully committed to promoting and protecting equity, diversity and inclusion,” said spokeswoman Kathryn Kranhold.

The Cal State Long Beach baseball team will travel to North Carolina for a three-game series that was contracted before Jan. 1.

Carbaugh, the Cal State Long Beach spokeswoman, said the law could prove challenging to keep up with. Activities such as academic conferences sometimes are planned more than a year in advance, and a new state could join the banned list after travel arrangements had been made.

Full story at LA Times.

To add a comment, click on Facebook, Twitter, Google+ icons OR go further down to the bottom of comments to the Post your comment box.

Comments

  1. Well, Catholics, if u vote for these monsters u get wht u deserve. U cannot in good conscience be a Catholic and vote Democrat, the party is inimical to Catholic dogma on many levels. Hope u realize this action as violating the First Amendment.

  2. These CommucRATS are also hypocrits! Compare this to what they criticize President Trump for limiting travel of 7 Middle Eastern Countries Refugees into our US. These countries harbor Islamic Terrorists with the goal of expanding/infiltrating the world with their pagan/demonic religion and wicked Sharia Law. The consequences of these unvetted refugees actions thwart the security of our US when their numbers grow to a point they have enough to successfully terrorize and entrap our nation. These are evil terrorists the CommucRATS are trying to protect; but at the same time they play a worse game banning travel of our own CA citizens from other US States that don’t go along with offending God, that don’t support the LGBTQ agendas and…

  3. Your correct Bruce and well put. The Commucrats live and criticize using a double standard. In their Marxist minds, they can ban with their authority without due regard to others for shameful reasons like offending God; however, they hypocritically criticize when those they oppose do similar only for truly good reasons like protecting our citizens lives. National Security of its citizens is one of the duties our federal government is responsible for!

COMMENTS POLICY: Comments are limited to 750 characters and will be truncated at 750. Comments should not contain offensive or libelous language. Please strive to be civil. All comments are subject to approval by our moderator and to editing as the moderator deems appropriate. Inclusion of your email address is optional.

Speak Your Mind

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

COMMENTS POLICY: Comments are limited to 750 characters and will be truncated at 750. Comments should not contain offensive or libelous language. Please strive to be civil. All comments are subject to approval by our moderator and to editing as the moderator deems appropriate. Inclusion of your email address is optional.